| dude | ||
![]() |
Prof.
Hall
rhall@csufresno.edu Physics Dept. |
|
| - |
a note on significant figures |
|
| significant figures: | Numerical results must be written with proper regard for significant
figures. A significant figure in a number is a digit which affects the
precision with which the number is given. A number written with appropriate care
for significant figures carries information about how precisely the number is
know. The following numbers all contain
three significant figures:
6.10x105 |
|
|
determining significant figures:
|
Applying these rules to the following list of numbers, can you convince yourself that all the numbers in the list have four significant figures? 3456Avoid the labor associated with the use of too many figures. For example, the statement "the length is 3.20 meters" implies that the correct length lies between 3.195 m and 3.205 m. Thus the error we attach to this length is plus or minus 0.005 m, (half of one unit of the least significant digit) and we see that no additional useful information is conveyed by quoting the total length as being 3.202465 m. This is of course because we don't know where the actual value lies between 3.195 and 3.205, so saying 3.202456 specifies more information (precision) that we actually have! As illustrated in this example, zeroes can be significant figures, and it is important to show them if so. Non-significant zeroes are most conveniently taken into account by using powers of ten (scientific notation). For example, if you wish to write 49000 to three significant figures, you should write:
or writing -0.00034000 to three sig. figs would be:
Now we will look at how to combine numbers with differing amounts significant figures. In all cases the rule to follow is the number that makes the greatest contribution to the uncertainty of a result determines the amount of significant figures. |
|
| rounding:
|
When combining numbers our computation may produce
many more digits than are significant, especially when using calculators.
First you will determine the number of required significant figures using the
rules below. Then follow these rules to round the answer to the required sig.
figs:
|
|
| significant figures for multiplication and division: | When dealing with products or quotients, round off the answer to the least number
of significant figures that appear in either of the terms from which it
is formed. That is, the number of sig. figs should be the same as that of the
input value which has the least sig. figs.
Example: It is desired to determine the area of a rectangle whose sides have been measured and found to be 65.27 cm and 73.83 cm. To determine the area, the product of the lengths of the two sides is taken which yields: (66.27 cm) (73.83 cm) = 4818.8841 cm2Although there are eight digits in the product, not all of them are significant. Our working rule is to round off the product to the least number of significant figures that appear in either of the terms from which it is formed. In the present example, both terms have four significant figures, and so the product can be rounded off to four significant figures or: 4819 cm2The reason for this procedure lies again in the fact that the last significant digit implicitly specifies the precision of the measurement. The side of length 65.27 cm is known to lie between 65.265 cm and 65.275 cm. This means that the rectangle has an area greater than (65.265 cm) (73.83 cm) = 4818.514950 cm2but smaller than (65.275 cm) (73.83 cm) = 4819.253250 cm2
|
|
| significant figures for addition and subtraction: | In determining significant figures for the
operations of addition and subtraction, the result is rounded off to the
last common digit occurring furthest to the right in all components.
Example 1, addition:
Example 2, subtraction:
Note that with addition or subtraction, the amount of significant figures in the result may be less that the amount in either of the inputs. In this case the answer has only two sig. figs, while the input numbers had 5 and 4 sig. figs respectively.
|
|
| combining
addition and subtraction with multiplication and division:
|
Example:
(182.65 g - 181.1g)/(0.1402 cm3) = (1.55 g)/(0.1402 cm3)= 11 g/cm3 In this example the subtraction first gives a result with two sig. figs (but we do not round until the very end!) so we write in 1.55 g. We then compute the division, which gives 11.0556 g/cm3. Recalling that the subtraction left us with only two sig. figs, whereas the denominator has 4 sig figs, the final result must be rounded to two sig. figs or 11 g/cm3. |
|
| exact numbers: | Exact numbers are to be treated as
infinitely precise. If we count four apples it would be stated thus: 4 apples.
However, in terms of significant figures we would assume it means
4.0000000.... to an infinite number of sig figs. Exact numbers usually involve
counted values or definitions.
Examples of exact numbers are;
|
|
| are significant figures important? A fable: | A student once needed a cube of metal which had
to have a mass of 83 grams. He knew the density of this metal was 8.67 g/mL,
which told him the cube's volume. Believing significant figures were invented
just to make life difficult for students and had no practical use in the real
world, he calculated the volume of the cube as 9.573 mL. He thus determined
that the edge of the cube had to be 2.097 cm. He took his plans to the machine
shop where his friend had the same type of work done the previous year. The
shop foreman said, "Yes, we can make this according to your
specifications - but it will be expensive."
"That's OK," replied the student. "It's important." He knew his friend has paid $35, and he had been given $50 out of the school's research budget to get the job done. He returned the next day, expecting the job to be done. "Sorry," said the foreman. "We're still working on it. Try next week." Finally the day came, and our friend got his cube. It looked very, very smooth and shiny and beautiful in its velvet case. Seeing it, our hero had a premonition of disaster and became a bit nervous. He summoned up enough courage to ask for the bill. "$500, and cheap at the price. We had a terrific job getting it right -- had to make three before we got one right." "But--but--my friend paid only $35 for the same thing!" "No. He wanted a cube 2.1 cm on an edge, and your specifications called for 2.097. We had yours roughed out to 2.1 that very afternoon, but it was the precision grinding and lapping to get it down to 2.097 which took so long and cost the big money. The first one we made was 2.089 on one edge when we got finished, so we had to scrap it. The second was closer, but still not what you specified. That's why the three tries." "Oh!" |
|
| hints for your homework: | When your homework is graded the program expects to see your answer
to the proper number of significant figures.
Entering in too few significant figures may result in a lost point. The program will give you a full point for a problem even if you are off the expected result by 2%. For example, if the expected (correct) answer for a problem is 29.4 cm/s you would receive full credit for 29.6 cm/s, but you would lose that point for an answer of 30 cm/s since that is more than 2% over the actual value. Sometimes entering in too many significant figures will also result in a lost point. Continuing the above example, if you were to answer 29.4235 cm/s the program will let you slide and give you the point, but if you answer 29.3555 the program will only see 29.3, (that is it does not round up for you) and only looks to the number of sig figs it expects. So again it would be more than 2% out of bounds. The best bet is to use scientific notation whenever you feel you need to be precise in placing the significant figure, or if the trailing zeros matter! For all homework from this point forward, the grade assigned by the WebAssign program will be final. So please be cautious in determining significant figures. It matters now as it will later in your career. |