Campus Portfolio

Educational Effectiveness Review
Opportunity

APPENDIX B2

 ANALYSIS OF SUPPORT PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

The analysis of support program effectiveness in Section B is based upon a study of all first-time freshmen entering during the fall terms of 1995-2001. That sample included 11,592 students. The sample was altered to exclude the 360 non-residents, 217 who were neither exempt from nor had taken the required Entry Level Math or English Placement Test, and 145 students with no record of their high school grade point average. The data presented is based upon the resulting set of 10,870 students. The composition of each cohort and the number of participants in each of the included program is shown in Table 1:

Table 1. Count of students in analyzed database by cohort and program

 

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Total

All

1364

1325

1405

1503

1605

1784

1884

10870

Bridge

126

158

176

198

189

188

187

1222

EOP

161

231

349

210

362

356

317

1986

CAMP

70

81

73

80

78

84

89

555

FMP

187

149

143

105

104

110

95

893

Non-Participants

1008

919

854

1045

1022

1168

1328

7344

The “expected” performance levels indicated in Section B are computed as follows: all students are categorized by five parameters: Admission Basis (regular or special); remedial status (needed or not needed); gender; ethnicity (African-American; Asian/Pacific Islander, Hispanic, White, or Other); initial major (four groupings based upon average persistence in those majors); and a composite of high school GPA and SAT with GPA the dominant feature – again five categories. This gives 800 distinct categories. For each category a particular success ratio is computed as the percent of all students in the category who had that success. For each non-empty category this percentage is multiplied times the number of students in that group who are in the support group under consideration and the results are then summed over the categories. This is interpreted as the number from that support group who would have had that success in the absence of the support.

Close Window